Data contribution hub

Feature Property
Document name Centrales de ciclo combinado térmico
File size 740 bytes
Layer name 10_09_CicloCombinadoTermica
Coordinate reference system European_Terrestrial_Reference_System_1989
PROJCS ETRS89 / UTM zone 30N
AUTHORITY EPSG
SPHEROID GRS 1980
UNIT metre
View raw data
          PROJCS["ETRS89 / UTM zone 30N",
    GEOGCS["ETRS89",
        DATUM["European_Terrestrial_Reference_System_1989",
            SPHEROID["GRS 1980",6378137,298.257222101,
                AUTHORITY["EPSG","7019"]],
            AUTHORITY["EPSG","6258"]],
        PRIMEM["Greenwich",0,
            AUTHORITY["EPSG","8901"]],
        UNIT["degree",0.0174532925199433,
            AUTHORITY["EPSG","9122"]],
        AUTHORITY["EPSG","4258"]],
    PROJECTION["Transverse_Mercator"],
    PARAMETER["latitude_of_origin",0],
    PARAMETER["central_meridian",-3],
    PARAMETER["scale_factor",0.9996],
    PARAMETER["false_easting",500000],
    PARAMETER["false_northing",0],
    UNIT["metre",1,
        AUTHORITY["EPSG","9001"]],
    AXIS["Easting",EAST],
    AXIS["Northing",NORTH],
    AUTHORITY["EPSG","25830"]]
        
  • Check general info
  • Classify columns
  • Verify metadata
You are not logged in. Please log in to work on this task.
Back to overview
  • ID
  • Uploaded by
    Santiago Rodriguez
  • Type
    MultiPoint
  • Properties
    4
  • Items
    10
  • Assigned to
    María Gracia Yepez

Shapefile content

id nombre potencia tecnologia
1 C.T. Los Barrios 568.0 C.S. Carbón Importado
2 C.C. Campo de Gibraltar (NGS) 781.0 Ciclo Combinado
3 C.C. Colón 398.0 Ciclo Combinado
4 C.C. Málaga 441.0 Ciclo Combinado
5 C.T. Litoral 1159.0 C.S. Carbón Importado
6 C.T. Puentenuevo 324.0 C.S. Carbón Nacional
7 C.C. San Roque 797.0 Ciclo Combinado
8 C.C. Arcos de la Frontera 1619.0 Ciclo Combinado
9 C.C. Palos de la Frontera 1195.0 Ciclo Combinado
10 C.C. Bahía de Algeciras 821.0 Ciclo Combinado

History and comments


This task was created by the system


Task was assigned to María Gracia Yepez and status was changed: Open → In Progress


Would a flaw or limitation include a shapefile that takes data from 2018, since it isn't "very" up to date with the present?


Status change: In Progress → Completed


All things considered 2018 isn't too bad ;-)
If it's VERY old (say more than 5) then I'd list it. Otherwise I'd just put a relatively soon updating date (say 1 year).