Simulation results of the urban assets in Beijing. Note. Business as usual (S1); F-E policy nexus scenario (S2-S9); F-W policy nexus scenario (S10-S13); E-W policy nexus scenario (S14-S29); E-F policy nexus scenario (S30-S31); W-F policy nexus scenario

In contrast, the strategies related to F-W policy nexus present a
continuously narrowing gap between S1, indicating that the pace of
ecological construction will become slower, if these F-W strategies
will be implemented. As shown in Fig. 6, with respect to AU and M,
the policies corresponding to the scenarios from 14 to 21 (S14-S21)
and 24 to 29 (S24-S29) present a different growing performance on
the accumulation of urban assets and money supply compared with
different scenarios, such as S12 and S13. Combined with Fig. 3 and
Fig. 4, this also represents the appearance of AU and M peak under
S14-S21 is later than S12 and S13.

Original source

This item is part of Development of an urban FEW nexus online analyzer to support urban circular economy strategy planning

Something wrong with this information? Report errors here.