Wallimann-Helmer, Ivo and Meyer, Lukas and Mintz-Woo, Kian and Schinko, Thomas and Serdeczny, Olivia and Mechler, Reinhard and Bouwer, Laurens M. and Schinko, Thomas and Surminski, Swenja and Linnerooth-Bayer, JoAnne
APA BibTeX RIS
Google Scholar Google
The Ethical Challenges in the Context of Climate Loss and Damage
This chapter lays out what we take to be the main types of justice and ethical challenges concerning those adverse effects of climate change leading to climate-related Loss and Damage (L&D). We argue that it is essential to clearly differentiate between the challenges concerning mitigation and adaptation and those ethical issues exclusively relevant for L&D in order to address the ethical aspects pertaining to L&D in international climate policy. First, we show that depending on how mitigation and adaptation are distinguished from L&D, the primary focus of policy measures and their ethical implications will vary. Second, we distinguish between a distributive justice framework and a compensatory justice scheme for delivering L&D measures. Third, in order to understand the differentiated remedial responsibilities concerning L&D, we categorise the measures and policy approaches available. Fourth, depending on the kind of L&D and which remedies are possible, we explain the difference between remedial and outcome responsibilities of different actors.
Something wrong with this information? Report errors here.